tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 28 18:57:44 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 21:57:42 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message fromGuido on Mon, 28 Jul 1997 14:49:44 -0700 (PDT))
>Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 14:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Guido <[email protected]>
>
>tlhobpu' Seqram:
>>>'elchugh yIntaHvIS, Hegh quvHa' Haw'law'. vaj wa'DIchlogh ghe''or 'el
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>>nuqjatlh?
>
>wej ghe''or 'el yInwI', ghot wa'DIch ghaHmo'. chay' 'e' vIQum, Hol
>vIpabtaHvIS 'a 'IHtaHvIS mu'wIj?
'elpa' Hoch, 'el? I know it's not specified, but -logh and -DIch on the
same word feels like two suffixes of the same type. It doesn't seem
right. -logh is multiplicity of times, and -DIch is ordinal... they don't
mix.
~mark