tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 27 15:35:09 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: using pronouns as "to be"

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: using pronouns as "to be"
• Date: 27 Jul 97 18:34:08 EDT

ghItlh SuStel
>
>Ick.  First off, {-bejbe'} is pretty funny.  "Not definitely."  Sounds like 
>{-law'} to me, why not use it?

Well, Okrand used "-bejbe'" once.  TKW p. 25: bISovbejbe'DI' tImer.  When in
doubt, surprise them.  Of course, it would be better as "bIHonDI' tImer."
Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon For The Galactic Traveler
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: cheghta' muHwI' !
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: using pronouns as "to be"
• Next by thread: KLBC: Insult
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level