tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jul 26 20:30:19 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ICQ Klingons

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: ICQ Klingons
• Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 22:31:05 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' charghwI':
>> Hoch De'wI'meyvaD lI'be' "ICQ".
>
>ghobe'. "Windows" De'wI'mey ngaS Hoch De'wI'. law'qu'
>De'wI'meyvam. De'wI'mey law'vaD lI'be' "ICQ". De'wI'mey law'vaD
>lI'qu' "ICQ". ghaytan "Windows" De'wI'mey law' law' latlhmey
>law' puS.

qech vIHechbogh DaSov, toDSaHoy.
'ach SoH qar law' jIH qar puS.

This does go back to the question of just what exactly {-be'} applies
to, however.  In my sentence, I wanted to negate the entire idea
"ICQ is useful for all computers", but it ended up meaning just as
easily "ICQ is useless for all computers" with only the verb negated.

Your (much longer) explanation of the situation is much more clear.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: ICQ Klingons
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Re: A pun
• Next by Date: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
• Prev by thread: Re: ICQ Klingons
• Next by thread: Re: ICQ Klingons
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level