tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 23 11:51:25 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: chIch

• From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: chIch
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:56 -0700

I wrote:
>
> DaHjaj yaHwIjDaq Qu' Dal manga'chuq.

Thaddaeus Vick wrote:
>      nuqjatlh jay'?  yaHlIjDaq bInga'chuq'a'?  nuqDaq bIvum?  pa'
> jIvum vIneHqu'! :)

DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.
jagh DajeymeH nIteb yISuvrup.

That one deserves 2 replacement proverbs. For some strange reason,   
*ngagh* and *ngach* get mixed up in my mind, and I think of *nga'chuq* as   
being related to *ngach*, not *ngagh*. We were *discussing* a rather   
boring job. I suspect I will not make that mistake again. And yes, the   
grammar is wrong - it was a long day.

pagh

• Prev by Date: Re: ICQ Klingons
• Next by Date: Cursing
• Prev by thread: Re: chIch
• Next by thread: KLBC: using pronouns as "to be"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level