tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 29 18:07:18 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Comparative construction

• From: Nick Nicholas <[email protected]>
• Subject: Comparative construction
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 13:06:35 +1100
• Organization: Ling & App Ling, Uni of Melbourne

Qumpu' 'Iwvan:

> I still have a soft spot for the {paghmo' tIn mIS}-type construction:

> {chaq nargh parmaq vIjonbogh;  chaq not parmaq vIjonta';
> ghu'vetlh qaq law'  ghu'vam qaq puS}.

Do'Ha': DaH paq mojmeH "paghmo' tIn mIS" ghItlhDaq vIlISlI'bogh, DachchoH 
mIwvetlh, 'ej qech Sarvetlh vIQummeH, -meHmey law' vIlo'choH. chaq 'ollaH 
ghItlhwIj vu'bogh SuStel'e'?

-- 
Kai san swqhkan t' akriba piota,          N N O  n.nicholas@linguistics.
kai san plhsiaze pia h wra tesseres,      I I L    unimelb.edu.au  http://
ston erwta doqhkan eutuxeis.              C C A  daemon.apana.org.au/~opoudjis
 K.P.Kabafhs, _Duo Neoi, 23 Ews 24 Etwn_  K H S    *Ceci n'est pas un .sig*

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Comparative construction
    • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Phrases
• Next by Date: KLBC: "Conversational Klingon"
• Prev by thread: RE: Phrases
• Next by thread: Re: Comparative construction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level