tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 28 14:44:30 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ram chal wanI'

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: ram chal wanI'
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 17:30:43 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ghItlh DaQtIq:
>chal SIj qeylIS betleH 'ej tlhIch Doqqu' regh chal. muvong.

bomwI' qa' Daghajbej, DaQtIq.

>bang mong lupe'DI' pachwIj, DIrDajDaq 'Iw tlhegh vIghItlh.

bang qa' qu' Daghajlaw' je.

>muvuQ 'Iw tlhegh rurbogh tlhIchvam. chal SuDqu'Daq Doqqu' 'ej wew. Dun!

SuD'a' banglI' DIr? :-)

>cha' yuQ vIleghlaw'. yuQ Doq vIlegh 'ej chaq yuQ tInqu' vIlegh.
>DIch vIghajbe'.

yuQ tInqu' Dalegh 'e' vIHon.
qaSpa' jav vatlh rep DaleghlaH 'e' botbej tera'.

>qaStaHvIS tuj jarmey, chaq juH DungDaq jIQong.

SaS'a' juHlIj Dung?  taH'a'?  :-P

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • ram chal wanI'
    • From: DaQtIq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: De' vIpoQ
• Next by Date: Re: semiotic continua (was "RE: KLBC: winners/losers")
• Prev by thread: jIQaHnIS
• Next by thread: Re: ram chal wanI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level