tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 19 01:11:13 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Hov veSmey KLBC

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Hov veSmey KLBC
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 97 22:38:21 UT

jatlh peHruS:

> In a message dated 97-02-11 10:06:01 EST, Thaddeus Vick writes:
> 
> <<   The Force is an energy *field*.  How about using <HoSchem>, or
>  <HoSchem'a'>?
>   >>

> We have {Surchem} for "force field."  But, since we are prohibited from
> extracting terms without further evidence--and {Sur} appears only in this
> way--we cannot simply say that {Sur} is the proper Klingon term for The
> Force.

'ach Dachup 'e' botbe'ba' ngoDvam.

Correct.  You cannot say this.  Don't.  (And there's no reason for there to BE 
a "proper" Klingon term for the Force.)

-- 
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97136.1

• Prev by Date: RE: loQ Colorado-Daq jIleng
• Next by Date: RE: nobHa' (was: tach Such)
• Prev by thread: Re: Hov veSmey KLBC
• Next by thread: Spell check......
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level