tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 12 13:06:30 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [KLBC] wo' mung



Robyn Stewart writes:
 > You definitely forgot one thing I told you, so I'll tell it again:  
 > Do not try to find the meaning of a word by looking up all its parts 
 > in the word list.  In 99.9 percent of the words I write, there is ONE 
 > root word, ONE stem that can be looked up in the wordlist.  I use 
 > compounds very rarely, usually annotate them when I do, and I don't 
 > think beginners should use them at all.  Here's how you would look up 
 > the word {ghuy'cha'}.
 > 

Just one comment... how was I suppose that profanity had a special
place in the TKD and that I had to look at the end of section 5.5 to
get it ? Well now I know. 

I don't think it's my fault if the klingon-english list removes words
because the traduction is '*@$%'.

 > tIqel     -> you take them into account
 > ghomaj    ?> you good us  ??? good isn't a verb so I don't get that one
 > ghomjaj   X> no idea what mjaj is
 > ghomagh   -> you betray us
 > ghom'egh  -> he meets himself  (I hope he's in front of a mirror)
 > ghmegh    X> impossible
 > lulIghmeH -> he rides you for
 > lulIghmaj -> our refuge
 > nIgheghmoH -> since they're roughing you
 > nIghmoH   X> impossible
 > ral'choH  -> he's starting to be violent
 > maw'choH  -> he's sarting to be crazy
 > maw'egh   ?> he's crazy himself   (doesn't make sens to me)
 > DuSaQmey  X> impossible, can't use mey with a verb
 > DuSaQmoH  -> he cause you to cry
 > 

Doing better ?

Phil


Back to archive top level