tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 09 20:34:17 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: A *with* suffix?

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: A *with* suffix?
• Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 22:05:00 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' ~mark:
>>coincidentally it appears that the "natives" used the same terminology.
>
>ghobe'.  mughwI' lo'bej "Louis Wu" jupDaj je...

toH, ngoDvam vIlIjpu'.  vaj loQ jImujta' -- rapba'be' lurgh mu'mey.
tera'Daq "Ringworld"-Daq je loS lurghmey lo'law' nganpu'.
Qo'noSDaq rur'a' ghu'?  tugh wISovjaj.

>tlhIngan Hol vIqelbe'mo', 'oH vIlo'qu'.

ghom chut vIbIvta'mo' jItlhIj.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: A *with* suffix?
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Harangue (was: Re: maHagh tlhInganpu')
• Next by Date: wo'rIv (was Re: KLBC: vIghojqa')
• Prev by thread: Re: A *with* suffix?
• Next by thread: Re: A *with* suffix?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level