tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 07 15:30:18 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: lu- (KLBC)

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: lu- (KLBC)
• Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 18:30:16 -0500 (EST)
• In-reply-to: <7107ECAEC9ECD0119BBC00805F684B9C39D5@VIPER>([email protected])

>Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 10:50:20 -0800 (PST)
>From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
>
>ghItlh ~mark:
>> I seem to recall canon for this, a use of "tu'lu'be'."  There it is.
>TKW p.29: "SuvwI'pu' qan tu'lu'be'".
>
>We also have "quvlIjDaq yIH tu'be'lu'jaj" from CK (or maybe PK), so
>Okrand has gone both ways with -be' on tu'lu'. Huj.

Exactly my point.  -be'lu' and -lu'be' don't seem to be very different in
meaning.

~mark

• References:
  • Re: lu- (KLBC)
    • From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: lurkers
• Next by Date: Re: Translation help needed
• Prev by thread: Re: lu- (KLBC)
• Next by thread: Re: lu- (KLBC)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level