tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 04 09:56:00 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Noun-noun with {'e'}
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Noun-noun with {'e'}
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 12:55:48 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from MarianSchwartz on Sat, 29 Nov 1997 15:37:44 -0800 (PST))
>Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 15:37:44 -0800 (PST)
>From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
>
>ghItlh Qov
>>}Can someone tell me why I shouldn't use {'e'} as the first noun of a pair
>>}of nouns in this way? This is scaring me; the longer I look at it, the
>>}more I think it works. I'm not going to run with it just yet; I'll wait
>>}for somebody to point out the obvious reason for it's being wrong. :-)
>>}The week is not yet finished, and I really didn't want to get into a big
>>}debate over yet another topic at the frontier of Klingon grammar...
>>
>>For one, {'e'} is a pronoun, and pronouns are only used in possessives
>when
>>it's a noun of proximity. 'ej vIpar jIH. DujwIj Davoq'a' :)
>
>And because, to quote Krankor (if I remember it correctly): "{'e'} is
>explicitly listed under the section of "Sentences as objects." We should
>not assume, without clearer evidence from canon, that it can be used for
>Sentences as subjects." This usage isn't a subject, but it's something
>other than direct object. (That *is* an interesting question. In {vaj Duj
>chIj} is {vaj} the object? This doesn't seem right; could someone give a
>clear argument to disprove it?) But *I* do believe that you can say
>{'e''e' vISov!} "I know *that*!"
TKD is quite explicit: "They ['e' and net] are always treated as the object
of the verb...." The object. Not the subject, the locative, or anything
else. In {yaS Duj chIl HoD}, {yaS} is not the object. The object is the
thing that the captain lost. Did the captain lose the officer? i should
think not! He lost a ship. A *ship*, mind you. It's the {Duj} that is
the object. True, that ship is *modified* by the presence of {yaS}; if you
will, yaS would be in genitive case if Klingon marked it (personally, I'd
rather consider it would be in genitive+accusative, if Klingon marked
both), but it is a modifier on the actual subject, the ship.
{'e''e'} makes my flesh crawl marginally less than other type-5's on 'e',
but only marginally. I don't much like it.
~mark