tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 19 10:29:59 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: HoghwIj
According to [email protected]:
>
> loQ Dalmo' povvam, HoghHom vISIQbogh vIDel vIneH.
wejpuH. Dajchugh HoghHom Dapegh'a'. Dalchugh neH juja'.
> wejHu' <Event Horizon> wIbejta' jIH maqochpu'wI' je. tlhIngan mu'qaD rur
> lutvetlh: ghe''orDaq luSpet 'oH DaqlIj'e'. bej latlhpu' 'e' Hechbogh
> chaH'vaD vIpeghHa'be' 'e' vItul.
lut DaDelbe'law'. bIpeghHa'be'ta'.
> vaghleS DuSaQ'a'Daq jIghojchoHta'. pa' De'wI' QeD vIHaD.
> wa'Hu' 'uQ vIchoptaHvIS, 'oy'choH woSwIj. chIch qabwIj nIHDop vIrIQmoHpu'
Do you really intend all these {-ta'}mey and {-pu'}mey to be
perfective? You keep giving us time stamps for when something
has been something. Why not give us the time stamp for when the
action actually happens? Or is that what you are doing and you
add perfective when you would be using past tense in English?
'ej qatlh chIch bI'oy''eghmoH?
> DaHjaj 'e' vItlhojpu'.
You can't use perfective on the second verb of Sentence As
Object. It is against the rules...
> chaq to'waQDu' SomrawDu' joq vIrIQmoH. DaH qabwIj
> nIHDopDaq QaplaHchu'be' Huy'wIj qoghwIj tlhonwIj qevpobwIj wuSDu'wIj je
> SomrawDu'.
yIyep! bIqan'a'? *stroke* Daghajchugh vaj yIloSQo'!
> ru' ghu'vam qab 'e' vItul. tugh qabwIj pojmeH Qel vISuch.
tugh? DaH! nom yIghoS!
> -taD
charghwI'