tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 07 12:50:22 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: New word from Okrand (vegh)
- From: "Jarno Peschier" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: New word from Okrand (vegh)
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 21:51:47 +0100
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Organization: Utrecht University, Computer Science
- Priority: normal
On 6 Aug 97 at 10:52, Robyn Stewart wrote:
> Yes you can write "ngem vIvegh" and "nentay vIvegh". See? I just
> did it. Is it normal usage? No. Marc specifically said "no" to
> forest and a nentay is a ritual, not a physical opening.
Why do people keep inventing interpretations of my original
nentay-vegh question that I did not mean nor explicitly wrote? It's
so... frustrating!
Again:
IF { Klingons see the two rows warriors participating
in nentay as one special concept that's part of the
ritual and it's culture} AND { there is (therefore) one
single word for these two rows of warriors } THEN
SUPPOSE { this word is "X" } THEN
{ Would "X vegh" be a valid way to describe
part of the ritual? }
END SUPPOSE
END IF
I never talked about "{two rows of [anything]} vegh", "nentay
vegh" or anything else you make up yourself. Oh, just forget about
this. This is really making me so sick and tired of vegh
that I probably won't use it ever just because of this
crap. I wished I never asked my question in the first
place... <sigh>
Qapla'
peSHIr
Jarno Peschier, computer science student, Utrecht University
mailto:[email protected] http://jarno.home.ml.org/
____________________________________________________________
'avwI' nejDI' narghta'bogh qama' reH 'avwI' Sambej