tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 06 19:53:01 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

KLBC: Time

• From: Tony Pierce <[email protected]>
• Subject: KLBC: Time
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 20:02:00 -0700
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

	SuStel,

What do you think of this?

SoHvaD poH vIghajbe'

for

I have no time for you.

I believe that -vaD would work here because "you" is the beneficiary of me
not having time. But I have a nagging feeling that poH doesn't belong where
it is. What's your opinion?


Kontay

• References:
  • Re: KLBC: curses with plural
    • From: Norman Thomas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: curses with plural
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC : AAF continued
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: curses with plural
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: curses with plural
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level