tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 24 15:26:26 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tlhIngan tIgh tu' *vIq* (was Re: Par'Mach is a Canonical)
- From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: tlhIngan tIgh tu' *vIq* (was Re: Par'Mach is a Canonical)
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 15:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "David Trimboli" at Oct 24, 96 02:52:01 pm
> jatlh taDI'oS vIq:
>
> <<< batlh vIparHa'qu' jay'! tlhIngan Hol vItu'choHDI' vISaHbe', 'ach "TKW"
> vIlaDDI'
> batlh vIlegh 'ej SuvwI'na' tIq moj tIqwIj. >>>
>
> toH! April <tlhIngan tIgh> ngevchoHlu'! tlhIngan Hol DaghojchoH'a' paqvam
> DalaDDI'? nom bIghojbejqu'! majQa'!
HIja', nom Holmey vIghojlaH. pIj ghotmey vImermoH. wIgh jIH'e' je. *IQ*wIj
wa'vatlh chorghmaH vagh'e'. jImIy 'e' peQubQo', ngoDmey vInob neH.
taDI'oS vIq, law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus A. Vick, Linguist to the Masses | mailto: [email protected] -or- |
| | [email protected] |
| gules, on a saltire argent voided azure, | |
| thirteen mullets of the second. Yeeha. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------