tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 22 22:46:13 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC:2 items
- From: "Adrian (HurghwI')" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC:2 items
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:31:21 -0600
At 03:02 PM 11/20/96 -0800, you wrote:
>jatlh HurghwI':
>
>> Like SuStel indicated, the use of the word "have" here is unnusual, even
>for
>> English. [. . .]
>
>'ej jatlh:
>
>> Yes, a chuS'ugh is a specific KIND of instrument. It is not a word for
>> "instrument." I think {bomlut} is the best translation.
>
>va, bIQochbe' neH! lI'be'chu' jabbI'IDlIj! bIjatlhqu' 'e' DaQoy DaneH'a'?
>vaj tlhIngan Hol yIlo'!
DaH tlhIngan Hol jIlo'.
mu'mey DaDelqu'be'pu'.
jIQIjpu' neH. chaq 'utHa' 'oH.
DaH potlh 'oH.
>SuStel
>Beginners' Grammarian
>Stardate 96889.5
-Adrian K
Hovjaj 96895.2
|
|
| \ HurghwI'
.-| |-. vogh vIghoSchugh, pa' SoH
/ / \ \ [email protected]
|_,\ / | http://www.jwp.bc.ca/peregrine
/ \\ //\_|__
| ___\\// /
|/ \ `----'
`-.__.-`