tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 20 15:01:11 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC Syntax - I'm lost
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC Syntax - I'm lost
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 96 22:01:35 UT
jatlh Kalos:
> >Nouns with {-Daq}, {-vaD}, or {-mo'} come before the object.
> [ . . .]
> couldn't they come where necessary or where they make the most sense
> meaning
> if they are neither the subject or object. I wish I could think of an
> example. Did I miss were that rule is or is it implied?
It's where they go. I don't quite understand what you mean by saying they
would make more sense somewhere else. If something happens "in my room," then
you precede the sentence with {pa'wIjDaq}. What else do you mean?
> >There's an exception (which people don't usually use, but
> >which you should know): the adverbial can come before the *verb*, if the
> >object noun has {-'e'} on it.
>
> Sorry I can't find that?
TKD p. 180.
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 96889.6