tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 18 18:00:07 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: prepared
- From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: prepared
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 96 19:59:46 CST
- In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 18 Nov 1996 15:35:58 -0800
>jatlh Qob:
>>
>> To get closer to "peaceful" I'd expect to use {-Ha'}. {ralHa'} is not only
>> "not-fierce", but actively "UN-fierce." This follows the pattern of such
>> pairs as {par}/{parHa'}, {Do'}/{Do'Ha'}, etc.
>
>The reason I used {-be'} instead of {-Ha'} is because I can't remember any
>canon which uses {-Ha'} on an adjectival verb, whereas I *do* know that {-be'}
>can be used. {wa'maH yIHmey lI'be'}. Since TKD section 4:4 says that {-qu'}
>may be used here, but doesn't mention anything else, I have played it safe and
>used {-be'}.
>
>Can anyone point out a canon example of using {-Ha'} on an adjectival verb?
>
>SuStel
Not quite sure what you're looking for, but how about:
belHa' be displeased
Do'Ha' be unfortunate, unlucky
jejHa' be dull
jotHa' be uneasy
matlhHa' be disloyal
pIvHa' be unhealthy
QeyHa' be loose
QuchHa' be unhappy
yepHa' be careless
yuDHa' be honest
Voragh