tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 14 19:26:02 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: diphthongs (was Re: <K'>vaD)
- From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: diphthongs (was Re: <K'>vaD)
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:22:48 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Adrian" at Nov 14, 96 03:36:59 pm
> It seems to me that, while {ay} isn't just a pair of letters, it is also not
> a letter, because pIqaD has no letter for it. I agree with the dipthong
> interpretation.
The pIqaD values are speculation, and there are some symbols that are
not used in the system we generally follow. Those symbols could represent the
diphthong-qoqmey. This is not a valid point i think.
taDI'oS vIq, law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus Vick, Linguist to the Masses | [email protected] -or- |
| | [email protected] |
| gules on a saltire argent voided azure | |
| thirteen mullets of the second. Yeeha. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
----------------------------------------------------------------------