tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 13 13:55:49 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Translation
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Translation
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 96 04:29:32 UT
jatlh HurghwI':
> Correct as usual . . . I realized this right after I sent the message, and
> had already changed my sig. However, don't words for location like {pa'},
> {naDev}, {vogh}, and {Daq} have an assumed {-Daq} suffix? If not, could I
> say {DaqDaq}?
Only the three words {pa'} (only in the sense of "thereabouts"), {naDev}, and
{Dat} have the location built-in and therefore cannot use {-Daq}. So, yes,
{DaqDaq} is a legitimate word.
> is my current sig correct?--> vogh bIjaHchugh, pa' SoH
voghDaq bIjaHchugh, pa' SoH.
> or should I change it to this?--> vogh bIghoSchugh, pa' SoH
vogh DaghoSchugh, pa' SoH.
SuStel
BG
Stardate 96868.4