tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 08 06:10:24 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lo'laH, moSwav, latlh
- From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: lo'laH, moSwav, latlh
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 06:01:51 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "David Trimboli" at Nov 7, 96 09:41:05 pm
ghItlh SuStel:
> Right, but you don't *know* if {pujmoHnIS} is correct, but you *do* know that
> {pujnISmoH} is correct . . .
'ach may' vIchu' vIneHchugh mu'qoqvam vIlolaHbej. Suvbechugh SuvwI',
tlhuHbe' SuvwI'!
SKI: Yeah, but it'd be fun to use it and then fight about it! :)
taDI'oS vIq, law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus Vick, Linguist to the Masses | [email protected] -or- |
| | [email protected] |
| gules on a saltire argent voided azure | |
| thirteen mullets of the second. Yeeha. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
----------------------------------------------------------------------