tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 07 21:36:27 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: lo'laH, moSwav, latlh

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: lo'laH, moSwav, latlh
• Date: Fri, 8 Nov 96 02:51:33 UT

jatlh taDI'oS:

>  My take on your example
>  would be that you could use the verb <pujmoH> and come up with >  
<pujmoHnIS>
>  or you could use the *other* verb <puj> in expressing the same concept, 
>  and
>  come up with <pujnISmoH>.

Right, but you don't *know* if {pujmoHnIS} is correct, but you *do* know that 
{pujnISmoH} is correct . . .

SuStel
Stardate    96854.5

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: lo'laH, moSwav, latlh
    • From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: How's this?
• Next by Date: Re: juHDajDaq chegh Qov
• Prev by thread: tugh Suv chaH
• Next by thread: Re: lo'laH, moSwav, latlh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level