tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 29 09:21:17 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Nice picture

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: Nice picture
• Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 12:23:28 -0500

ghItlh charghwI':
>...qaDIlmeH bIyIn 'e' vIchaw'taH...

This violates the rule that the second verb in a sentence-as-object
contruction may not have an aspect suffix.  I point it out so that
nobody uses it as an example of grammatically perfect Klingon.

{charghwI' pabmo' wIbepmeH jaj 'oHlaw' DaHjaj}.

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC double object verbs
• Next by Date: Hamlet: Final Update
• Prev by thread: Re: Nice picture
• Next by thread: Re: Nice picture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level