tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 20 19:22:24 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: This Stone Thread; SOLVED!!
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: This Stone Thread; SOLVED!!
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 22:21:45 -0500
David Barron writes:
>nagh lanbeHlu'bogh
~mark writes:
>Hmm. I like it and I don't. On the one hand, it makes a certain amount of
>sense. But on the other hand, -beH is generally a reference to the
>*subject*....
My similar suggestion of {nagh lI'beHmoHlu'bogh} uses {-moH}, which I
think would take care of this problem, except that it also uses {lI'}
where you wanted {lanlu'}, and the {-lu'} is already spoken for.
How about these?
vaS'a'Daq jeSbeHbogh nagh'e'
vaS'a' veH muvbeHbogh nagh'e'
vaS'a' Som ngaqbeHbogh nagh'e'
vaS'a' cherbeHbogh nagh'e'
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj