tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Mar 10 10:42:44 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "never again"
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: "never again"
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:42:13 -0500
In a message dated 96-03-04 20:16:49 EST, you write:
>peHruS writes:
>>>taghwI'pu' pabpo' jIH. tlhIngan Hol lulo'chu'meH taghwI'pu' reH
vIqeSqang.
>>
>>We have {muv} for "recruit." May I use this word to apply to newbies?
>
>If you want to convey the same sort of feeling the word "newbie" evokes,
>I suggest using {chu'wI'}.
>
>>In place of taghwI'pu', (initializers <> initiates).
>
>That depends on whether you consider {tagh} to have a transitive or an
>intransitive meaning here. The intransitive {taghwI'} "beginner" is how
>I use it.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
>
>
naDev jIHtaH peHruS
{muv} vIghItlhHa'pu' 'ach {ghuv} vIHechpu'
nIblaH {chu'wI'} "newbies" je
'ach "trigger" 'oH je {chu'wI'}'e'
qatlh {taghwI'}'e'
I see this as "initiators," not "initiates."
peHruS