tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 01 08:05:38 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jI`eqlaw`
- From: David Barron <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jI`eqlaw`
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 09:05:35 -0700 (MST)
On 03-01-96 [email protected] wrote to Multiple recipients of li...
>
> > ghIHqu'mo' DujHomwIj, pIch vIghaj. chaq tugh vIghIHHa'moH.
> jaj Hoch, puqloDwI' 'o' vIghIHHa'moH; vISay'moHtaHvIS, mu'vetlh vIlo'
> vIQIjmeH. Dajlaw', mu' nIb wIlo'. /Say'moH/ /lamHa'moH/ je DIlo'be'.
^^^^^^^^
Now wait. According to TKD 6.4.2 shouldn't the purpose clause
PRECEDE the verb whose purpose it's describing?? I.e., shouldnt
the -meH phrase precede {vISay'moHtaHvIS}?
>
> > charghwI'
>
> --Holtej
>
---
* OFFLINE 1.58 * jIquvHa''egh'pa' jIHeghqang