>Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 19:08:01 -0700 >From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson) >Andre Seesink writes: >> maj. jItlhIj, pItlh'a >> good. I apologise, but it's done. >I'm not sure {pItlh} is all that appropriate here; it works, but {rIntaH} >seems better to me. "pItlh" vImaS jIH. chaq Sar Qapla'lIj (ugh. That's probably bad.) ~mark