tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 26 19:56:34 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Appropriateness (was Re: RotterdamDaq qep'a)
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: Appropriateness (was Re: RotterdamDaq qep'a)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:39:59 -0500
Ben Warren writes:
>Speaking of Hol (and to justify this post), I have a simple Hol question:
>
>Could "jI (I) + Har (believe) + be' (not) = yIHarbe' (I do not believe)"?
No way.
It could, however, be {jIHarbe'} -- notice the first letter. :-P
But be careful: {jI} doesn't just mean "I". It's a verb prefix that not
only means the subject is "I" but that there is no object. By using it,
you have basically said something like "Believing is not something I do."
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj