tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 30 10:25:41 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Words for God
- From: Jose Mijares <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Words for God
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 96 13:28:25 -0400
>Subject: Re: Words for God
>Sent: 7/29/96 8:21 PM
>Received: 7/30/96 1:24 PM
>From: Alan Anderson, [email protected]
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: Multiple recipients of list, [email protected]
>
>~mark writes:
>>Use of relativizers for law'/puS constructions are on the list of things
>>being asked Marc Okrand, at least they were a while ago. In fact, I think
>>he even answered that in my interview with him printed up in HolQeD. You
>>can't do relative clauses with law'/puS simply, he said. You have to say
>>"This commander is boldest. That commander...." and so on. Someone
>>remember the HolQeD reference to give AA?
>
>HolQeD 4:2, page 5: "Interview: Okrand on {-bogh} and more"
>
>The bottom line is that {-bogh} seems only to work on normal subjects
>and (direct) objects. The {law'/puS} topic didn't actually come up
>during the interview (at least it wasn't reported in HolQeD}; it was
>about the possible use of a locative as the head of a relative clause.
>But I can't really see {-bogh} working in a comparitive construction.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
>
>
Ok, [email protected] and [email protected] are the same
persons, the mailer change autamtily the name, please unsuscribe me of
this list.
thank
Jose Mijares
Jose Mijares
Sysop LogicOnline BBS..El BBS de los usuarios Macintosh. Telf 582-238-2803
_________________________________________________________________________
[email protected] | [email protected] | Sysop@4:890/7.fidonet
_________________________________________________________________________
Si quieres un cambio, no hagas siempre lo mismo (Albert Einsten) :-)