tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 24 21:25:34 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: suffix-o-mania

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: suffix-o-mania
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:24:50 -0400

qaSDI' 96-07-24 21:14:47 EDT, jatlh vay':

> > I thought I understood, but the next posting I looked at contained the
>  > sentence: <Saghbe'taH QujwI'pu'mo' vIng SuStel.> I would have put the
>  > -mo' on the verb instead. Please explain more about -mo'.

jIvIngbe'qu'!!!  <vIng SuStel> muja'qa' vay' vaj muSuvqangba' . . .

SuStel
Stardate 96564.4

• Prev by Date: RE: juHwIjDaq jIH
• Next by Date: Re: translating and gaps in vocabulary
• Prev by thread: Re: suffix-o-mania
• Next by thread: new words
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level