tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 22 19:10:26 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: philosophy - I think, therefore I am.
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: philosophy - I think, therefore I am.
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 22:10:21 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from Roger Cheesbroon Fri, 19 Jul 1996 21:22:10 -0700)
>Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 21:22:10 -0700
>From: Roger Cheesbro <[email protected]>
>SuStel wrote: jIQubtaH, vaj jIH. I think, therefore I am.
>I think that jIQubtaH, vaj jIHtaH would be more correct. Ref: TKD 6.3
I don't see that the -taH is required. It is used, yes, but nowhere do I
see an implication that it has to be. It's a matter of style, I guess; it
may be better style one way or another, but there's also personal taste
involved.
~mark