tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 11 15:25:03 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: pIqaD again [Was Re[2]: Noun apposition]

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: pIqaD again [Was Re[2]: Noun apposition]
• Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 18:25:03 -0400

qaSDI' 96-07-11 15:52:07 EDT, jatlh Doq:

> Or maybe, like with Hebrew names which also do double duty as 
>  nouns, you just gotta go with context, or ask. Seems to fit in 
>  more with "canon" pIqaD, which has not obviously outstanding 
>  letters.

Without knowing more about {pIqaD}, how can you tell what an outstanding
letter looks like?  How do you know they *are* letters?  Perhaps the symbol
which the KLI uses to represent, say, {tlh}, is really a marker to indicate a
proper name?  Who knows?

SuStel
Stardate 96528.2

• Prev by Date: Re: `Kahless' book
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC:vIttlhegh [ST:K]
• Prev by thread: Re: pIqaD again [Was Re[2]: Noun apposition]
• Next by thread: Klingon organizations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level