tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 08 10:17:00 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: usage of Hoch and latlh
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: usage of Hoch and latlh
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 13:16:57 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message fromSteven Boozer on Fri, 5 Jul 1996 21:56:45 -0700)
>Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 21:56:45 -0700
>From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
>jIQochbe'. I don't think there's any chance of confusion:
> Hoch no'Da' All of his/her ancestors
> Hoch no'cha' All of their ancestors
no'Daj and no'chaj. Only first and second person possessives vary for
sentient and non-sentient. There is no suffix -Da'/-cha', and no insult in
referring to no'Daj.
~mark