tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 01 11:40:07 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Introductions
On Mon, 1 Jul 1996, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> I see little difference between these two. Of course, the only difference
> is the order of whether you have the description first or last.
> ghunchu'wI' has seen some canon with description first, chIya'ghu likes it
> better last... It could even be seen as a toss-up as to which is
> desccription and which is head-noun. After all, apposition means that the
> two noun-phrases both refer to the same thing. I think I like the more
> Englishy ordering of chIya'ghu, but that may simply be due to a lack of
> proper Klingon consideration on my part.
>
> ~mark
>
Hmm... Is "Star Trek:Klingon" considered "canon"? Because in one scene,
Qua'lon (sp?) sings "poq torghen puqloD" that is "Pok, Son of Torghn".
So that would make "wo'rIv mogh puqloD", wouldn't it?
dave yeung (btw I'm new here)