tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 30 16:34:08 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: tera'ngan pab
- From: david barron <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: tera'ngan pab
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:34:05 -0700 (MST)
At 07:08 PM 1/29/96 -0800, you wrote:
>ghItlh 'etlhqengwI':
>>pab wIja'chuqDI', mu'mey motlhbe' ghItlhtaH ghojwI'pu' po'.
>
>{ja'chuq} is glossed as "discuss, confer" in TKD. It's obviously
>the verb {ja'} plus the suffix {-chuq}, so it can't have an(other)
>object.
Hang on a minute.
Your argument for disecting {ja'chuq} is sound but it assumes that
that because it can disected it must fit that mold. To me this is one
of those ambiguous words which we must bring to Okrand.
>-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
>
david
David Barron [email protected]
Klingon Language Postal Course, PO Box 37, Eagle ID 83616
It's FREE! Send Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope.
Not available by E-mail, so dont ask.