tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 30 09:15:51 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -wI'
>> Could someone explain the controversy surrounding the use of
>> -wI' with the intended meaning of "thing which is"? I have read the
>> HolQeD article arguing against it, what's the arguement for it?
>
>It *is* mentioned in TKD but only in the very back of the
>book, page 167. That give is some weight however there is no
>other mention of this usage in TKD nor any other Okrand
>canon that I am aware of.
>
It is allso mentioned in the very beginning of the book.
Page 19........
+-----------------------------------------+
| User error...................... |
| Replace user and press enter when ready |
+-----------------------------------------+