tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 11 23:43:29 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: several questions

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: several questions
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 02:42:58 -0500

In a message dated 96-01-10 13:33:35 EST, you write:

>For this particular verb ("be true") I think you are ignoring
>the most obvious tool in Klingon. Why do you think we have the
>suffixes {-ba', -bej, -chu'}? "It is true that he wants to go,"
>can be translated into two words: jaH neHbej. 

jIQochbe'chu'     qechvam QIjmeH mu'mey QaQqu' bIH {-ba'}'e' {-bej}'e'
{-chu'}'e' je

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: maDub + Concept of New Use for {-mo'}
• Next by Date: Re: perpetual Today Is A *****
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: several questions
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: several questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level