tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 20 11:05:52 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: poHmey

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: KLBC: poHmey
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:07:19 -0500

'etlhqengwI' writes:
>I think I missed a good portion of this thread.  Is there something
>wrong with the following?
>
>poH HIja'

Yes, there is something wrong with it.
{poH} doesn't refer to "what time it is".  It refers to a "period of time".
The closest we have to "the time of day" is {rep} "hour".

[And it uses that "verb-suffix-indicates-indirect-object" construction
that I find so distasteful, but that's my problem, not yours.]

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Prev by Date: Re: wov ngIl je'
• Next by Date: Re: Maqbeth needs checking.
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: poHmey
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: poHmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level