tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 04 23:40:42 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: <De' pegh>
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: <De' pegh>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 96 8:40:33 MET
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Alan Anderson" at Feb 2, 96 10:29 am
- Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
>
> Is there any other support, canon or otherwise, for the interpretation
> of {pegh} to be extended beyond TKD's description?
>
recently, ~mark and our friendly grammarian, Cpt. Krankor,
both said, that on CK we have "pegh De'vetlh" for
"that is classified information". "De'vetlh" can't be
the verb, so... :)
HomDoq
--
----------------------------------------------------
Marc Ruehlaender [email protected]
Universitaet des Saarlandes, Saarbruecken, Germany
----------------------------------------------------