tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 17 14:15:16 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh

• From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 16:15:03 CST
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Dec 1996 15:38:42 PST." <[email protected]>

ghItlh HurghwI'
> jIQub, vaj jIH
> "I think, therefore I am."
> 
Disregarding any grammtical questions on this one...
with respect to Okrands recent explanation about the
use of {Qub} as "I believe that <statement> is true"
do we have canon for its meaning "forming thoughts"?

HomDoq

• References:
  • mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh
    • From: "HurghwI'" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 'etlhmey
• Next by Date: Re: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
• Prev by thread: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh
• Next by thread: RE: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level