tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 17 02:36:14 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jItlhob Hoch
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jItlhob Hoch
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 02:35:02 -0800
At 21:51 15/12/96 -0800, you wrote:
}>such. However, it should probably be spelled *Sarq* or *SarQ*, and
}>pronounced *shark*, or *sharkh* more or less.
}
}The -rQ- or -rq- combination is not legitimate, is it?
}I would guess Sark to transliterate as {SarIq}
I use Sargh.
---
Qov [email protected] tlhIngan Hol ghojwI'