tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 16 13:05:13 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
- From: "Dark Viper (mayq)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: parmaq (par'mach) - oh, it *IS* canon, eh?
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 16:06:29 -0500
At 08:07 AM 12/16/96 -0800, Joel Anderson wrote:
>Or, as I said back on 10/21:
>
> Par'Mach is a Canonical word. Period.
No it's not, but <parmaq> is. They're obviously different.
-mayq