tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 09 10:19:44 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: More Translations...
- From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: More Translations...
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:17:47 -0600 (CST)
>> I do think so. I think that is why {tuQHa'moH} exists in the
>> dictionary at all.
>>
>I think it is still possible to have clothes as the object of
>"undress", although I see your point about Okrand's being more
>likely to give "put off (clothes)" as a translation in that case.
>But then, do you see a way to translate "put off (clothes)"?
>(If we cannot use {tuQHa'moH}?)
>
>HomDoq
Sure: (Sut) teq "remove/take off (clothing)"
Voragh