tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 06 09:19:44 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Why bother with pong?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:39:07 -0800
>From: [email protected] (JEFF ZEITLIN)
>
>
>T::>>>*'orqut* jIH
> ::>>*'orqut* nuq?
> ::>>What's an 'orqut? What species is that?
> ::>>"I am an 'orqut" or "I am 'orqut", etc.....
> ::>>
> ::>It works in other languages.
> ::>"Hello, I'm Roger.
>
> ...to which the obvious immediate response is "Klingon isn't
> other languages".

True enough, and I've come out against "X jIH" as a naming statement
already.

But I recently was thinking back to my own usage, and I realize that I
*have* said "*Mark Shoulson* jIH" on occasion.  Not in order to inform
someone of my name, but on the phone, when I called someone who knows me
already (by name if not voice), so they knew who called.  I wonder if that
is different from giving someone your name, and if I can logically support
it for this purpose but not for naming.  Or if I should drop it
altogether.  Just something I realized about my own past usage.

~mark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBMqhVoMppGeTJXWZ9AQEXUQL/UiDTwHB7mNk5GDt4XhhmrFyvcJX6w35t
OkGNXePNaKjgpH06Rju9oaPhx0Glq70AJ5myTfkeIDqmqFxttOKshQeHnSMc9ESA
EpuHN8H+krwZBZ2BuDilDNccn9yPBYPl
=GtvJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Back to archive top level