tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 15 20:39:58 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: **Again into the fray...**

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: KLBC: **Again into the fray...**
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 22:42:31 -0500

ghItlh SajQa':
>toH!
>jInIDqa'.

maj.  yInIDtaH.

>mu'meywI' jIqeq. choboQ jIneH.

qaboQrup.

I'm not too sure about {qeq} as a transitive verb; it doesn't sit right
with me for some reason, but I can't give a good explanation.  I'll let
it go for now, and maybe someone will jump in with another opinion, or,
better yet, a canon reference that resolves it one way or another.

Both of your sentences have objects, but the main verb in each has the
{jI-} prefix indicating no object.  In each case, it needs to be {vI-}
(the first is a plural third-person object, the second is singular).

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Five elements
    • From: Jon Van Hoose <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon pongmey
• Next by Date: Re: Indexing all Klingon words
• Prev by thread: KLBC: **Again into the fray...**
• Next by thread: Re: Five elements
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level