tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 05 11:19:54 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nuqneH (JAM)

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: nuqneH (JAM)
• Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 14:22:12 -0500

qhItlh peHruS:
>>toH.  pIleghpu'.  chay' bIvang DaneH?
>>So.  We have seen you.  Now what do you want to do?
>
>naDev {chay' bIruch DaneH}'e' wIghItlhlaH'a'

I think {ruch} needs to refer to some action in particular, or at least have
some more context, before it makes sense to use it in this way.

juHwIj DaSuchnIS.  chay' bIruch DaneH?

DaHjaj yIHmey DIHoHtaH.  bIH vIbeQmoHmeH qutluch 'ugh vIlo'.
qa'vIn tujqu'Daq lan charghwI'.  chay' bIruch SoH DaneH?

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Prev by Date: Re: the casual use of {nuqneH}
• Next by Date: Re: Is it out there?
• Prev by thread: Re: nuqneH (JAM)
• Next by thread: Re: toughie
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level