tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 27 10:54:47 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: 'oH'egh'chu' (was Re: Hoghvam bom)



At 20:11 22-10-95 -0700, you wrote:
>ghItlh charghwI':
>>'oHpu' 'oHchoHpu'pa' 'oHpu''e', nuq 'oHpu' 'oHpu''e'? 'oH 'oH
>>'oH'e'.
>>
>>Note: This is EXACTLY as dreadful in Klingon as it was in
>>English. Maybe worse.
>>
>>Definitely worse.
>
>HIja'!  qabqu' 'ach pe'vIl jIHaghqu'taH!
>charghwI' bIval 'ej bIpo'.  yabwIj yIlo'Ha'Qo'.

Mmm, just testing my Klingon:

"You tell me! It is very bad, but forcefully I'm able to *laugh* [about it].
You are a clever conquerer and and expert. ?????"

Could someone help me with this one? I'm a bit at a los here (and not too
sure about the parts I was able to translate)...

          Jarno Peschier, [email protected], 2:2802/245.1@Fido
      162:100/100.1@Agora, 74:3108/102.1@QuaZie, 27:2331/214.1@SigNet
___________________________________________________________________________
     What was was, before was was was? Before was was was, was was is.



Back to archive top level