tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 27 00:41:13 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: To The Klingon Community

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: To The Klingon Community
• Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 03:40:42 -0400

In a message dated 95-10-24 17:05:12 EDT, you write:

>	This letter is being posted to the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list.  It is also
be
>
>posted to the Usenet news group alt.klingon.  Additional copies are being 
>printed and mailed out to all members of the KLI and all individuals who
have
>
>pre-ordered copies of the KLI's production of Hamlet.  This rigorous 
>distribution is required to try and limit the confusion and disinformation
>which
>seems likely to follow in the wake of Mr. Proechel's publication.  

A few days ago I discovered on the WWW the Nick Nicolas version of Hamlet and
printed out a hardcopy.  Is this version at all authorized?

Meanwhile, why does Nick Nicolas use {bIH} to refer to {lomqa'}?  Even if
{lomqa} are plural inherently, the proper pronoun to use is {'oH} (TKD p24 &
Sec. 4.1, 5.1).

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: To The Klingon Community
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nIteb maghIQ
• Next by Date: Morphology
• Prev by thread: correction
• Next by thread: Re: To The Klingon Community
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level