tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 27 07:31:27 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qeylIS betleH and stuff
On Mon, 27 Nov 1995, Elizabeth C. Hoyt wrote:
> I thought canon was just what MO writes.
Well, we'd all like to believe this, and I think it's the unspoken rule
on this list. He is the final authority, the one true source. But canon
will be whatever comes from Paramount, whether they got Okrand to do it
or not.
The difference is, if Paramount did it, we're likely to say it's some
unknown dialect, and forget about it. If Okrand says it, then we
incorporate it into our knowledge of the language.
> tlheghmeQ
--Holtej