tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 27 06:55:36 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tlho'taHmeH jaj

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: tlho'taHmeH jaj
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 09:13:47 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from AlanAnderson on Wed, 22 Nov 1995 10:03:04 -0800)

>Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 10:03:04 -0800
>From: Alan Anderson                        <[email protected]>

>*USA*ngan juppu'wIj:

qatlh jutIch? jup*wI'* SoH 'e' vIHarpu'...

>tlho'taHghach yupma' botIvjaj.

I think I prefer tlho'meH yupma'.  Adding -ghach may not be a Bad Thing,
but gratuitous -taH's just to add -ghach is cheap (it's an Esperantism,
based on the E-o habit of adding its continuous suffix, -ad, to verbs when
nouning them (marteli -> martelado).

~mark

• References:
  • tlho'taHmeH jaj
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Two words from "The Chase"
• Next by Date: Re: KLI on the Electronic Telegraph again.
• Prev by thread: tlho'taHmeH jaj
• Next by thread: tlho'taHmeH jaj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level